Navigation

    Fuze Arena Logo
    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Help
    • Discord

    Exciting news...

    Announcements
    13
    21
    1192
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • Jongjungbu
      Jongjungbu F last edited by

      Well he said bytecode and that normally means it is compiled but still uses an interpreter. Like Java.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • pianofire
        pianofire Fuze Team last edited by

        AFAIK this will not affect the language so programs should be compatible. Programs that use update() to sync should still run at the same speed they are just more likely to achieve 60fps and can do more work between frames.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 5
        • PB____
          PB____ last edited by

          This is great news for the platform, and good to know that this will be coming our way this year-ish :)
          So if we use tiles that are larger than 14x14px we can fill the screen with sprites of them without issues :D

          @pianofire are you referring to programs that are using update() to prevent errors about too many operations? Or is this a hint about new commands? (I'm assuming the first :P )

          pianofire 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • pianofire
            pianofire Fuze Team @PB____ last edited by

            @PB____ I was just trying to explain that existing programs won't run faster but they may run smoother and in future you will be able to do more without dropping frames. Perhaps I didn't phrase it very well!

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • PB____
              PB____ last edited by

              Oh, that makes sense :) I was just seeking too much behind the mentioning of the syncing mechanism :)

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • PickleCatStars
                PickleCatStars F last edited by

                60hz is always going to be the top limit, but there’ll be fewer frame drops if you have a lot going on. This is good news for me! How much faster is it than what we have now? What’s the framerate for 10,000 bouncing 80x80 images at 1080p, can anyone test?

                Martin 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • PB____
                  PB____ last edited by

                  I've written the code from the video and with that exact code I'm mostly at 20 fps (sometimes dips to 19.9 :) )

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                  • PB____
                    PB____ last edited by

                    On the current version, I managed to win up to .5 fps by changing dx[i] = -dx[i] to dx[i] *= -1 (it saves one time accessing the array) and doing the same for dy[i]...

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • Martin
                      Martin Fuze Team @PickleCatStars last edited by

                      Great work guys (@Luke in particular of course) !!

                      @toxibunny said in Exciting news...:

                      60hz is always going to be the top limit, but there’ll be fewer frame drops if you have a lot going on. This is good news for me! How much faster is it than what we have now? What’s the framerate for 10,000 bouncing 80x80 images at 1080p, can anyone test?

                      Just to quote Jon: "It's still a few months away" - I'm sure more details will follow in due course...

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                      • xevdev
                        xevdev F last edited by

                        Can't wait to try this out on some of my projects.
                        A few can barely muster 10 fps so hopefully this will speed up the whole code base.
                        Well done and good luck.
                        In the mean time I'll try for some more speed the old fashioned way ...

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • waldron
                          waldron F last edited by

                          I know a couple of my games were dropping to 25/26 FPS a large amount of stuff is happening all over in the program so hopefully I can revisit them probably due to the way I was coding it but this will be a good test to see.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • PickleCatStars
                            PickleCatStars F last edited by

                            A few months away gives us time to do good stuff now, and then souped-up sequels later on. New Super Fuzeotron X 3D is going to be epic!

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 6
                            • pugmartin
                              pugmartin F @Jonboy last edited by

                              To all the team this looks phenomenal.
                              I remember the change with Amos Compiler at times was insane

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                              • Jaywalker
                                Jaywalker Donator last edited by

                                nice, looking forward to it

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                • First post
                                  Last post